Replies
Bob:
I don't have experience with the shaft seal stuffing box replacement. We
did replace the stern tube (with larger ID & thickness) and the stuffing
box last spring. We considered the new type shaft seal but felt that the
traditional arrangement is easier to maintain and perhaps more robust.
Our project came about during a check of the rubber hose that connects the
stuffing box to the stern tube. The stern tube broke - must have had a
circumferential crack! This was during spring prep - on land. It would have
been a disaster to have it occur at sea.
All parts (including proper fiberglass stern tube) were from Holland Marine
Products, Toronto and work was done by South Shore Marine, Chester, Nova
Scotia.
If you need any details let me know.
Regards,
Fraser Farmer
Bob,
I also considered fot a time to replace the traditional stuffing box by a
more modern packless seal.
The problem is that there is not much room above the shaft due to the engine
with V-drive configuration on the CS36. A safe tolerance between the hose
of a modern packless shaft seal and the bottom of the engine/gearbox, allowing
for vibration without making any contact between them, is essential. The
diameter of the seal is therefore critical. In most cases the modern seal
has a bigger diameter compared to the diameter of the traditional stuffing
box and hose because a rubber bellows is needed to obtain some pressure between
two surfaces to keep the water inside the tube and sealing system.
The two modern options I heard good stories about are:
* the P.S.S. Shaft Seal sold in the US by PYI (also sold by West Marine);
* the surprisingly cheap shaft seal made by Volvo (in England also called
the "Black Jack" .
I know of two CS36 boats in which the Volvo seal is installed (in one already
for 5 years) and the owners are very satisfied with the configuration. I
need to mention that the Volvo seal is made for a 25 mm shaft. Nevertheless
installation is possible on a 1 inch shaft. In fact the guys from Volvo in
England (lots of boats there with shafts with a diameter of 1") claim that
the seal lasts longer on a 1 inch shaft and gives also less dripping.
The only thing is, that you have to diminish the diameter of the shaft tube
a little with sandpaper. Installation has to be done with lots of soapy water.
I myself decided not to buy a modern seal, because when it fails you are
in more trouble than with a traditional stuffing box. So I bought from West
Marine the "Dripp-Less Moldable Packing Kit" (around 50 USD), consisting
of pieces of Teflon moldable packing that forms an extra lubricant and also
a water resistant seal between two conventional packing rings in the stuffing
box. I use rings of 1/4 inch Multi-Service Teflon Packing (also obtainable
in the US). The two rings and the moldable Teflon stuff are also treated
with a special Teflon grease (part of the kit supplied by West Marine).
I did the installation myself with te boat afloat. The only problem I encountered
was that I found it difficult to get an even and also substantial layer of
moldable Teflon packing between the two traditional packing rings. Because
of variations in thickness of the Teflos stuff after I put this into the
Hex Spud, I could not get the last traditional ring into the Spud to get
the Hex Spud around for more than one whole turn.
In the end and after using some bad words, I found that this was in fact
a rather easy job. I leaved the last traditional ring out, closed the stuffing
box not to tight and started the engine for a minute or two in forward gear.
After that operation I found it easy to get the last traditional packing
ring in the box.
After a few drips and tightenings of the Hex Spud during the first few hours
of motoring, the engine room bilge stayed completely dry for the whole season.
I wish you good luck with the option you choose!
Best Regards,
Willem J. Kroes
Bob, I considered instaling a newgen shaft seal but was also concerned about
the instalation. During last spring's haulout I replaced the traditional
flax packing in the nut with teflon packing. I was told by the yard to tighten
it more than "normal". There has been no water ingress and I don't recall
tightening it more than once since. I used 12" of 1/4" stuffing costing $5.40.
I had actually bought such a seal and a conversation with a marine surveyor
discouraged me and I returned to the old stuffing box. He told me that as
the seals get older, they tend to break without any warning. When that happens,
there is no way to stop the flow of water. He said he was called upon for
insurance purposes to survey two boats in the last year which had sunk because
of a faulty seal. This was enough for me to return the expensive seal I had
bought and stick to the old proven stuff!
Hi Michel!
Thanks for your input on the shaft seals. Most of us seem to get caught up
in the vortex, of what's new and wonderful, without thinking it through.
What can be more simple and reliable, than the standard stuffing box? Regards,
David...
Well now...
Perhaps there are shaft seals and there are "other" shaft seals. I would
not venture to condemn them all with the same brush stroke. From the experience
of 25 years in the boat business I know that surveyors are not infallible
(or omniscient) either. In fact some curmudgeonly surveyors I have known
are worst source of mistruths and maligned personal opinion.
Before writing off modern shaft seals... take a close look at the PSS sold
by PYI, or the Tides Marine Strong Seal. Both of these units are robust and
used on the finest and most expensive yachts built and have been proven by
hundreds of thousands of hours of severe commercial powerboat use. Come on
... you don't think technology has advanced in the last century? That old
waxed linen cord stuffing box is at least that old. And I have seen boats
sink becuase of them too. Actually the rusting (so-called stainless steel)
hose clamps on the shaft log hose that are most often the guilty culprit.
Especially so if the boat has a V-drive and the skipper rarely even takes
glance at it for years at a time!
There are (or were) some rather flimsy units marketed. The original Las-drop
seal had a rather thin rubber or neoprene "bellows" that connected the shaft
log to the seal itself. I recall that they recommended regular replacement
of the bellows for safety sake. I assume that like most owners, few ever
did this recommended maintenence.
Both the PSS and Tides Marine seals have very hoses at least as substansial
to reinforced steam-type hose normally used on a conventional stuffing box.
I had a PSS seal on my Nordic 44 for many years. And since my new CS36T
is simularly cursed with a V-drive, I will install either the PSS or Tides
Marine Seal on it this spring.
Visit the PYI web site and get the real poop!
Jerry Cann
Ok Now...
Why mess with something that just plain works.
The standard stuffing box works and works better if you use teflon packing
which was used on all CS boats, I believe from the mid eighties on. I've
used this method for the past 12 years without a hitch. If you have a Vee
Drive and it's difficult to access and adjust, I can see your point.
It does occasionally require an 1/8 to 1/4 of a turn, making sure the locking
nut is secured (double wrenched). This is a good time to inspect the clamps,
hose, coupling (4 hex bolts) and grub screw. WD40 on the clamps and coupler
help to fight corrosion in a saltwater environment.
I'm not knocking the new the shaft seals, I just can't find a whole lot wrong
with the standard stuffing box.
Regards, David...
Jerry -
Thanks for your comments. I've been reading these various notes about shaft
seals with rather casual interest but little more than that. Your note mentioning
the Lasdrop seal rang a bell in the back of my brain and caused me to check
my collection of manuals and instructions accompanying our 1988 CS36M. Sure
enough, it does have a Lasdrop shaft seal, and even more surely enough, the
instruction sheet clearly states that the bellows and any hose parts should
be replaced in same fashion as engine hoses - ideally every 2-3 years. I
guess it may be about time to do that. Thanks for the reminder. I think I'll
check it over thoroughly while we're out of the water.
Scott Armentrout
A mechanic I spoke with suggested staying with the traditional stuffing box
but to use Teflon packing. His theory was that we could tighten it up to
eliminate dripping and the relatively low revs on a Westerbeke 33 is not
likely to overheat the shaft and score it. However, a representative at Holland
Marine in Toronto said not to use Teflon packing as it will not stand up
to sea water. Confused? I am. Any thoughts?
Phil Cocking |